4/24/2021 0 Comments Rorschach Interpretation Guide Pdf
For more information on the use and potential unreliability of the Rorschach test read Misuse of Psychological Tests in Forensic Settings: Some Horrible Examples by Ralph Underwager and Hollida Wakefield.I have been collecting stories about psychiatric screwups for a while.
It seems only fair to post some of the interpretation summaries so that Redditors can see how they did. They have been in the public domain in Hermann Rorschachs native Switzerland since 1992 (70 years after the authors death, or 50 years after the cut-off date of 1942), according to Swiss copyright law. They are also in the public domain under United States copyright law where all works published before 1923 are considered to be in the public domain. This means that the Rorschach images may be used by anyone for any purpose. William Poundstone was, perhaps, first to make them public in his 1983 book Big Secrets, where he also described the method of administering the test. The standard imagery seems to be based on psychoanalysis and original conjectures of the 1920s. It would probably be dangerous to try to derive universals, when so many variations exist between cultures and subcultures, etc in each region of planet earth. Military people have different responses compared to nonmilitary. The idea of the game was to collect inkblot cards that could be bought from local shops and make associations and stories from the inkblots. He therefore developed the Rorschach test as a diagnostic tool for schizophrenia. Rorschach Interpretation Guide How To Make InkblotThe book explained how to make inkblot monsters (gobolinks) and use them as prompts for writing imaginative verse. After the color blobs were interpreted, he drew conclusions about the nature of the person. Beuys. Controversy about the reliability and validity of the Rorschach has been present since its conception. Today, many - probably most - psychologists think the Rorschach is nonsense. Many professionals now feel that the Rorschach is outdated, inaccurate, and meaningless. There is nothing to show what any particular response means to the person who gives it. And, there is nothing to show what it means if a number of people give the same response. The ink blots are scientifically useless. Bartol, 1983). The only thing the inkblots do reveal is the secret world of the examiner who interprets them. These doctors are probably saying more about themselves than about the subjects. Anastasi, 1982). What these comments seem to indicate is that the Rorschach is potentially unreliable, easily misinterpreted, and essentially not a valid means of determining what it claims to detect.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |